|
|
Post by The North Polish Union on May 28, 2014 22:42:24 GMT
1) How will you limit 1.)the executive power of the WAD and/or EC in order to ensure more freedom for the populace? 2) How will you promote unity between all Slavians in Slavia? 3) Do you plan to build an efficient military? If so, how will you do so? 4) How will you promote activity? 5) What are some of your accomplishments? 1.) In my platform, I laid out a strategy for returning the elections for the EC back to the people, this making them more accountable to the populace and therefore less likely to abuse their authority. This would obviously have the effect of limiting the WAD's influence, as they can no longer have a hand-picked club of influential supports running the region. 2.) Obviously, Slavia is a very ethnically diverse region, so I believe that complete unity would not only be impossible, but also detrimental. Cooperation and respect between members, however, is a good thing and is entirely achievable. Thankfully, so far in the regions history, disrespect of other members has only been a problem for a few people, all of whom are now banned. 3.) In my platform, I laid out a plan that would make the military's operations less tied to the personal interests of those in power. However, that alone will not solve the whole problem. A complete purge of the Army's membership followed by a period where citizens may reapply for the Army is the only real way that we can assure that the Army's members are actually active. Also, more fully informing Army members of planned action is helpful. I believe in the past there was one incident when only a few members were informed of a mission, thus causing it to fail. 4.) Again, in my platform Iaid out a plan for promoting activity, and indeed, the entire platform's purpose is to prevent stagnation. Unfortunately I'm on my phone right now, so I can't copy/paste my platform, but I will try to encourage greater citizen participation in government, thus promoting activity. 5.) I was the region's second WA Delegate ever and have months of experience as Delegate. I was Foreign Minister for a very long period, as well as recruitment Minister for a while (back when we still had to do manual recruiting). I also have been responsible for refounding Slavia twice. |
|
|
|
Post by Slovsko on May 29, 2014 10:00:23 GMT
To all candidates: Will we see a new strike policy implemented or will it stay the same? I would like to see the third strike's penalty limited to a temporary ban (say, one or two months). Obviously there's a time and place for permanent bans, but goofing up 3 times on the RMB doesn't warrant one and permanent bans should be issued only for much more serious problems. It depends on what you mean by "3 times goofing" . In some recent case, this was not it. It was not simply goofing a made simple 3 mistakes, they strikes were given to major blowouts , because the given person was known for goofing a lot. Depending on this topic, I would like to ask all the candidates: How about changing it to whats permanent and whats temporary ban. Would you be interested in developing such idea, or simply create a format, where all the strikes are written down with explanations and such .. to prevent anyone from questionning the decision, or to know what action was given a strike , etc ... ? |
|
|
|
Post by Bolkania on May 29, 2014 11:59:58 GMT
I would like to see the third strike's penalty limited to a temporary ban (say, one or two months). Obviously there's a time and place for permanent bans, but goofing up 3 times on the RMB doesn't warrant one and permanent bans should be issued only for much more serious problems. It depends on what you mean by "3 times goofing" . In some recent case, this was not it. It was not simply goofing a made simple 3 mistakes, they strikes were given to major blowouts , because the given person was known for goofing a lot. Depending on this topic, I would like to ask all the candidates: How about changing it to whats permanent and whats temporary ban. Would you be interested in developing such idea, or simply create a format, where all the strikes are written down with explanations and such .. to prevent anyone from questionning the decision, or to know what action was given a strike , etc ... ? *Please note for all intensive purposes, our most recent and so far only nation that has received the 3rd strike will be named subject A. People have had mixed views on subject A's permiban, but let's clear of few things up. Subject A has been playing around long before myself and Slovsko came up with the strike system, and it not take long for him to get the 3rd strike. Now, in all cases in which subject A got a strike was because of abstract foolishness on the RMB and mostly causing arguments, the latter really annoyed people in Slavia. It all comes down to severity, and past actions. We knew subject A was causing trouble, and people (He can come forward, but I will not name him) even TGed the founder account in Slavska calling for tougher action against those like subject A. To answer your question anyway, of course, if someone is normally fine, but once he has caused some kind of disagreement on the RMB, sure, I may not give him or her a strike. However, if he or she has a past history and I well known to be a trouble maker, I will be more inclined to give him or her a strike, just like when it comes to permanent or temporary. I believe however, that if elected, I will create a page for the justice minister altogether, clearly showing how the strike system works. Also, since subject A is gone over the last month, has anyone noticed how Slavia is more peaceful? This settles the argument for that case over a periban. |
|
|
|
Post by The North Polish Union on May 29, 2014 17:48:26 GMT
I would like to see the third strike's penalty limited to a temporary ban (say, one or two months). Obviously there's a time and place for permanent bans, but goofing up 3 times on the RMB doesn't warrant one and permanent bans should be issued only for much more serious problems. It depends on what you mean by "3 times goofing" . In some recent case, this was not it. It was not simply goofing a made simple 3 mistakes, they strikes were given to major blowouts , because the given person was known for goofing a lot. Depending on this topic, I would like to ask all the candidates: How about changing it to whats permanent and whats temporary ban. Would you be interested in developing such idea, or simply create a format, where all the strikes are written down with explanations and such .. to prevent anyone from questionning the decision, or to know what action was given a strike , etc ... ? Obviously in the recent incident the person in question was known as an intermittent troll. However, I personally don't believe his actions were serious enough to warrant a permanent ban, just a one- or two-month one. I think that permanent bans should be reserved for those who have consistently strived to bring down our region, like CCR and Belarus-. And yeah, a permanent database (or something like that) to mark down strikes and the reasons for them would be good. |
|
|
|
Post by Rutthenia on May 30, 2014 2:18:49 GMT
A question to all contestants : How do you plan to encourage friendly relations with other regions. If you don't plan to then why? We need to approach the friendly relations differently depending on the region. Personally, I with we should encourage friendly relations with both Slavic and other kinds of regions we can trust. |
|
|
|
Post by Rutthenia on May 30, 2014 2:20:47 GMT
To all candidates: Will we see a new strike policy implemented or will it stay the same? The strike policy should mostly be left alone, but instead of after 2/3 warnings you are kicked out, the first strike should be a warning, the second a temporary ban (depending on what the person has done), and the third strike should be a permanent ban. |
|
